본 연구는 태권도 승품·단 심사 제도에 따른 심사위원에 관점에 따른 과목별 채점요인에 따른 평가기준을 분석하여 각 승품·단 심사제도에서 요구되는 기술체계와 명확한 심사기준을 제시함으로서 불신을 해소하는데 목적이 있다. 현 승품·단 심사위원 39명을 대상으로 승품·단 채점요인에 따른 설문지조사를 실시하였으며, 이중 신뢰성이 떨어진 7명의 자료를 제외한 총 32명의 자료를 분석하였다. 연구결과 1품·단 심사에서는 품새의 시선과 자세, 겨루기에서는 시선이 채점요인에서 중요 하게 나타났으며, 2품·단 심사에서는 품새의 중심, 겨루기에서는 기의 다양성과 기합으로 나타 났고, 3품·단 심사에서는 품새의 강·약과 완급, 겨루기에서는 중심과 신축이 채점요인에서 크게 나타났다. 4품·단 심사에서는 품새의 강·약, 중심, 완급, 자세, 겨루기에서는 시선, 중심, 기합, 완급, 신축, 기의 다양성을 기준으로 심사기준이 나타났다. 각 품·단별로 성취해야 할 기술체계와 심사 평가기준에 대한 일관성을 제시하였다. 

The purpose of this study is to analyze the basis of evaluation for the Taekwondo promotion test and to gain people's trust when proposing the correct standards.This study conducted a survey with judges about the evaluation basis for Taekwondo promotion testing and analyzed the data from 39 judges. Seven data from the judges were unreliable. After all investigation was determined, the 1st poom/dan promotion test was focused on the eyes and body position, which was important for poomsae. For sparring, focus and intention was important. For the 2nd poom/dan promotion test: Balance was important in poomse with diversity of energy and kiap (yelling) being important in sparring. For the 3rd poom/dan promotion test: Determining between strength and weakness in motions, use of power, control and the speed of techniques were important for poomsae, while balance and flexibility were important in sparring. And for the 4th poom/dan promotion test: For poomsae, determining between strength and weakness in motions, use of power, balance, control, the speed of techniques, and body position were important. While focus, intent, balance, kiap, controlling the speed, and flexibility, were important in sparring. The essential techniques a practitioner should practice for the ability to promote up to his or her next poom level and the evaluation standard of promotion testing were proposed in this research.

논문투고일: 2015. 09.30.
논문심사일: 2015. 11.10.
심사완료일: 2015. 11.19.